Atom x7211RE vs E3815
Aggregate performance score
Atom x7211RE outperforms Atom E3815 by a whopping 1527% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Atom E3815 and Atom x7211RE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3391 | 2042 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Atom | no data |
| Power efficiency | 2.10 | 28.43 |
| Architecture codename | Bay Trail-I (2013) | Amston Lake (2024) |
| Release date | 8 October 2013 (11 years ago) | 8 April 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $134 | $42 |
Detailed specifications
Atom E3815 and Atom x7211RE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.47 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 96 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 2 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 6 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 10 nm |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Atom E3815 and Atom x7211RE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | Intel BGA1170 | Intel BGA 1264 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 5 Watt | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom E3815 and Atom x7211RE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom E3815 and Atom x7211RE are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom E3815 and Atom x7211RE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4, DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel HD Graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 16EU |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom E3815 and Atom x7211RE.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 9 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.11 | 1.79 |
| Recency | 8 October 2013 | 8 April 2024 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 2 |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 5 Watt | 6 Watt |
Atom E3815 has 20% lower power consumption.
Atom x7211RE, on the other hand, has a 1527.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 120% more advanced lithography process.
The Atom x7211RE is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom E3815 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Atom E3815 and Atom x7211RE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
