Xeon Gold 6538Y vs Celeron M U3400

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M U3400 and Xeon Gold 6538Y processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Celeron Mno data
Architecture codenameArrandale (2010−2011)no data
Release date24 May 2010 (14 years ago)1 October 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron M U3400 and Xeon Gold 6538Y basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads264
Base clock speedno data2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.06 GHz4 GHz
Bus rate2500 MHzno data
L2 cache512 KBno data
L3 cache2 MB60 MB
Chip lithography32 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size81+114 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °C79 °C
Number of transistors382+177 Millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M U3400 and Xeon Gold 6538Y compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketBGA1288FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt225 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M U3400 and Xeon Gold 6538Y. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Celeron M U3400 and Xeon Gold 6538Y technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB++
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M U3400 and Xeon Gold 6538Y are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M U3400 and Xeon Gold 6538Y. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-5200
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M U3400 and Xeon Gold 6538Y.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data80

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 May 2010 1 October 2023
Physical cores 2 32
Threads 2 64
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 225 Watt

Celeron M U3400 has 1150% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 6538Y, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, and 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Celeron M U3400 and Xeon Gold 6538Y. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron M U3400 is a notebook processor while Xeon Gold 6538Y is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M U3400 and Xeon Gold 6538Y, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M U3400
Celeron M U3400
Intel Xeon Gold 6538Y
Xeon Gold 6538Y

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 4 votes

Rate Celeron M U3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Gold 6538Y on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M U3400 or Xeon Gold 6538Y, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.