Xeon D-2876NT vs Celeron M U3400

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M U3400 and Xeon D-2876NT processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Celeron Mno data
Architecture codenameArrandale (2010−2011)no data
Release date24 May 2010 (14 years ago)1 October 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron M U3400 and Xeon D-2876NT basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads232
Base clock speedno data2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.06 GHz3.1 GHz
Bus rate2500 MHzno data
L2 cache512 KBno data
L3 cache2 MB20 MB
Chip lithography32 nmno data
Die size81+114 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors382+177 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M U3400 and Xeon D-2876NT compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketBGA1288FCBGA2579
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt100 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M U3400 and Xeon D-2876NT. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
QuickAssistno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Celeron M U3400 and Xeon D-2876NT technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDB++
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M U3400 and Xeon D-2876NT are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M U3400 and Xeon D-2876NT. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data1 TB
Max memory channelsno data4
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M U3400 and Xeon D-2876NT.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data32
USB revisionno data3.0
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data24
Number of USB portsno data4
Integrated LANno data+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 May 2010 1 October 2023
Physical cores 2 16
Threads 2 32
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 100 Watt

Celeron M U3400 has 455.6% lower power consumption.

Xeon D-2876NT, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, and 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Celeron M U3400 and Xeon D-2876NT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron M U3400 is a notebook processor while Xeon D-2876NT is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M U3400 and Xeon D-2876NT, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M U3400
Celeron M U3400
Intel Xeon D-2876NT
Xeon D-2876NT

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 4 votes

Rate Celeron M U3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon D-2876NT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M U3400 or Xeon D-2876NT, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.