Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 vs Celeron M U3400

Place in the ranking	3123	531
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	Intel Celeron M	AMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9)
Power efficiency	1.53	47.11
Architecture codename	Arrandale (2010−2011)	Strix Point (Zen 5) (2024)
Release date	24 May 2010 (14 years ago)	1 October 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron M U3400 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	8 (Octa-Core)
Threads	2	16 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c
Boost clock speed	1.06 GHz	5.1 GHz
Bus rate	2500 MHz	54 MHz
L2 cache	512 KB	no data
L3 cache	2 MB	no data
Chip lithography	32 nm	4 nm
Die size	81+114 mm²	no data
Maximum core temperature	105 °C	no data
Number of transistors	382+177 Million	no data
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M U3400 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Socket	BGA1288	FP8
Power consumption (TDP)	18 Watt	28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M U3400 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	no data	USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), Secure Processor, SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
AES-NI	-	+
AVX	-	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	no data
Idle States	+	no data
Thermal Monitoring	+	-
Flex Memory Access	+	no data
Fast Memory Access	+	no data

Security technologies

Celeron M U3400 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB

no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M U3400 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 are enumerated here.

VT-x

no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M U3400 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types

DDR3

DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

no data

AMD Radeon 880M

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.29	13.86
Recency	24 May 2010	1 October 2024
Physical cores	2	8
Threads	2	16 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c
Chip lithography	32 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	18 Watt	28 Watt

Celeron M U3400 has -87.5% more threads, and 55.6% lower power consumption.

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, on the other hand, has a 4679.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, 300% more physical cores, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M U3400 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M U3400 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.