Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 vs Celeron M P4500
- Interface
- Core clock speed
- Max video memory
- Memory type
- Memory clock speed
- Maximum resolution
- Interface
- Core clock speed
- Max video memory
- Memory type
- Memory clock speed
- Maximum resolution
General info
Comparing Celeron M P4500 and Core 2 Duo SL9600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 2462 | 2578 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Celeron M | Intel Core 2 Duo |
| Architecture codename | Arrandale (2010−2011) | Penryn (2008−2011) |
| Release date | 1 April 2010 (13 years old) | 1 March 2009 (14 years old) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $86 | $316 |
Technical specs
Celeron M P4500 and Core 2 Duo SL9600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.13 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.86 GHz | 2.13 GHz |
| Bus support | 2500 MHz | 1066 MHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 6 MB |
| L3 cache | 2 MB | 6 MB L2 Cache |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 81+114 mm2 | 107 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 105 °C |
| Number of transistors | 382+177 Million | 410 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | - |
| VID voltage range | no data | 1.05V-1.15V |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M P4500 and Core 2 Duo SL9600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | PGA988 | BGA956 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 17 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M P4500 and Core 2 Duo SL9600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
| FSB parity | no data | - |
Security technologies
Celeron M P4500 and Core 2 Duo SL9600 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M P4500 and Core 2 Duo SL9600 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | no data | + |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Celeron M P4500 outperforms Core 2 Duo SL9600 by 28% in our combined benchmark results.
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.
Benchmark coverage: 20%
Celeron M P4500 outperforms Core 2 Duo SL9600 by 23% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
Celeron M P4500 outperforms Core 2 Duo SL9600 by 47% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Benchmark coverage: 18%
Core 2 Duo SL9600 outperforms Celeron M P4500 by 16% in wPrime 32.
Advantages and disadvantages
| Performance score | 0.77 | 0.60 |
| Recency | 1 April 2010 | 1 March 2009 |
| Cost | $86 | $316 |
| Boost clock speed | 1860 | 2130 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 17 Watt |
Based on the results of synthetic tests, our recommendation leans towards the Celeron M P4500 due to its superior performance when compared to the Core 2 Duo SL9600 processor.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M P4500 and Core 2 Duo SL9600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
