Core 2 Duo SL9600 vs Celeron M P4500
Aggregate performance score
Celeron M P4500 outperforms Core 2 Duo SL9600 by a significant 27% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2938 | 3052 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Celeron M | Intel Core 2 Duo |
| Power efficiency | 1.67 | 2.71 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Arrandale (2010−2011) | Penryn (2008−2011) |
| Release date | 1 April 2010 (15 years ago) | 1 March 2009 (16 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $86 | $316 |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M P4500 and Core 2 Duo SL9600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.13 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.86 GHz | 2.13 GHz |
| Bus rate | 2500 MHz | 1066 MHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 6 MB |
| L3 cache | 2 MB | 6 MB L2 Cache |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 81+114 mm2 | 107 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | 105 °C |
| Number of transistors | 382+177 Million | 410 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | no data | 1.05V-1.15V |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M P4500 and Core 2 Duo SL9600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | PGA988 | BGA956 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 17 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M P4500 and Core 2 Duo SL9600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
| FSB parity | no data | - |
Security technologies
Celeron M P4500 and Core 2 Duo SL9600 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M P4500 and Core 2 Duo SL9600 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | no data | + |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.61 | 0.48 |
| Recency | 1 April 2010 | 1 March 2009 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 17 Watt |
Celeron M P4500 has a 27.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.
Core 2 Duo SL9600, on the other hand, has 105.9% lower power consumption.
The Intel Celeron M P4500 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
