Celeron 2.8 GHz vs Turion 64 ML-28
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3580 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Turion 64 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Lancaster (2005−2006) | Northwood (2002−2004) |
| Release date | June 2005 (20 years ago) | no data |
Detailed specifications
Turion 64 ML-28 and Celeron 2.8 GHz basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | 400 MHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | no data |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 130 nm |
| Die size | 125 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 114 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Turion 64 ML-28 and Celeron 2.8 GHz compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | 754 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 512 KB | 128 KB |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion 64 ML-28 and Celeron 2.8 GHz. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| PowerNow | + | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 512 Watt | 128 Watt |
Turion 64 ML-28 has a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.
Celeron 2.8 GHz, on the other hand, has 300% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD Turion 64 ML-28 and Intel Celeron 2.8 GHz. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
