EPYC 7413 vs Celeron M 722

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 722 and EPYC 7413 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated131
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data14.05
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Celeron MAMD EPYC
Power efficiencyno data16.62
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Milan (2021−2023)
Release date1 October 2008 (16 years ago)15 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,825

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 722 and EPYC 7413 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads148
Base clock speedno data2.65 GHz
Boost clock speed1.2 GHz3.6 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
Multiplierno data26.5
L1 cache64 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm7 nm+
Die size107 mm24x 81 mm2
Number of transistors410 Million16,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 722 and EPYC 7413 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
SocketVGA956SP3
Power consumption (TDP)5.5 Watt180 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 722 and EPYC 7413. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 722 and EPYC 7413 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 722 and EPYC 7413. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.795 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 722 and EPYC 7413.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2008 15 March 2021
Physical cores 1 24
Threads 1 48
Chip lithography 45 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 5 Watt 180 Watt

Celeron M 722 has 3500% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7413, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, 2300% more physical cores and 4700% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron M 722 and EPYC 7413. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron M 722 is a notebook processor while EPYC 7413 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 722 and EPYC 7413, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 722
Celeron M 722
AMD EPYC 7413
EPYC 7413

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Celeron M 722 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 3 votes

Rate EPYC 7413 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 722 or EPYC 7413, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.