Atom CE4100 vs Celeron M 722
Primary details
Comparing Celeron M 722 and Atom CE4100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Celeron M | no data |
| Architecture codename | Penryn (2008−2011) | Sodaville (2009) |
| Release date | 1 October 2008 (16 years ago) | 24 September 2009 (15 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 722 and Atom CE4100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.2 GHz | 1.2 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | 56 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | 96 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 410 Million | 47 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 722 and Atom CE4100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | VGA956 | Intel BGA 951 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 5.5 Watt | 7 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 722 and Atom CE4100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 722 and Atom CE4100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR2, DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 October 2008 | 24 September 2009 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 5 Watt | 7 Watt |
Celeron M 722 has 40% lower power consumption.
Atom CE4100, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 months.
We couldn't decide between Celeron M 722 and Atom CE4100. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 722 and Atom CE4100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
