Atom CE4100 vs Celeron M 722

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 722 and Atom CE4100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeron Mno data
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Sodaville (2009)
Release date1 October 2008 (15 years ago)September 2009 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 722 and Atom CE4100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Boost clock speed1.2 GHz1.2 GHz
Bus support800 MHzno data
L1 cache64 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die size107 mm226 mm2
Number of transistors410 Million47 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 722 and Atom CE4100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketVGA956Intel BGA 951
Power consumption (TDP)5.5 Watt7 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 722 and Atom CE4100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel GMA 500

Pros & cons summary


Power consumption (TDP) 5 Watt 7 Watt

We couldn't decide between Celeron M 722 and Atom CE4100. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 722 and Atom CE4100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 722
Celeron M 722
Intel Atom CE4100
Atom CE4100

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Celeron M 722 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

This processor has no user ratings yet.

Rate Atom CE4100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 722 or Atom CE4100, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.