Celeron M 925 vs M 585

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 585 and Celeron M 925 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2977not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeron MIntel Celeron M
Power efficiency1.31no data
Architecture codenameMerom (2006−2008)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date20 August 2008 (16 years ago)1 January 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$70$70

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 585 and Celeron M 925 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Boost clock speed2.16 GHz2.3 GHz
Bus rate667 MHz800 MHz
L2 cache1 MB1 MB
Chip lithography65 nm45 nm
Die size143 mm2107 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
Number of transistors291 Million410 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 585 and Celeron M 925 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketPPGA478PGA478
Power consumption (TDP)31 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 585 and Celeron M 925. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 August 2008 1 January 2011
Chip lithography 65 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 31 Watt 35 Watt

Celeron M 585 has 12.9% lower power consumption.

Celeron M 925, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron M 585 and Celeron M 925. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 585 and Celeron M 925, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 585
Celeron M 585
Intel Celeron M 925
Celeron M 925

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.8 4 votes

Rate Celeron M 585 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.6 7 votes

Rate Celeron M 925 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 585 or Celeron M 925, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.