Phenom II X2 B57 vs Celeron M 575
Aggregate performance score
Phenom II X2 B57 outperforms Celeron M 575 by a whopping 216% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Celeron M 575 and Phenom II X2 B57 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3167 | 2628 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Celeron M | no data |
| Power efficiency | 0.76 | 0.93 |
| Architecture codename | Merom (2006−2008) | Callisto (2009−2010) |
| Release date | 1 June 2008 (16 years ago) | 11 May 2010 (14 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $86 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 575 and Phenom II X2 B57 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Bus rate | 667 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 128 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 6 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 143 mm2 | 258 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 291 Million | 758 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 575 and Phenom II X2 B57 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | PPGA478 | AM3 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 31 Watt | 80 Watt |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 575 and Phenom II X2 B57. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 575 and Phenom II X2 B57.
| PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.25 | 0.79 |
| Recency | 1 June 2008 | 11 May 2010 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 2 |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 31 Watt | 80 Watt |
Celeron M 575 has 158.1% lower power consumption.
Phenom II X2 B57, on the other hand, has a 216% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.
The Phenom II X2 B57 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M 575 in performance tests.
Be aware that Celeron M 575 is a notebook processor while Phenom II X2 B57 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 575 and Phenom II X2 B57, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
