Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 vs Celeron M 420

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 420 and Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesCeleron Mno data
Architecture codenameYonah (2005−2006)Northwood (2002−2004)
Release dateno dataJune 2003 (21 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 420 and Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads12
Base clock speed1.6 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz3.07 GHz
Bus rate533 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data8 KB
L2 cacheno data512 KB
L3 cache1 MB L2 KB0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm130 nm
Die sizeno data131 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data74 °C
Number of transistorsno data55 million
64 bit support--
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.0V-1.3Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 420 and Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPPGA478478
Power consumption (TDP)27 Watt70 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 420 and Mobile Pentium 4 3.06. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Celeron M 420 and Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 420 and Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 are enumerated here.

VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 420 and Mobile Pentium 4 3.06. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR1, DDR2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron M 420 139
Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 220
+58.3%

Pros & cons summary


Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 65 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 27 Watt 70 Watt

Celeron M 420 has a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 159.3% lower power consumption.

Mobile Pentium 4 3.06, on the other hand, has 100% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Celeron M 420 and Mobile Pentium 4 3.06. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 420 and Mobile Pentium 4 3.06, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 420
Celeron M 420
Intel Mobile Pentium 4 3.06
Mobile Pentium 4 3.06

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 80 votes

Rate Celeron M 420 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 4 votes

Rate Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 420 or Mobile Pentium 4 3.06, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.