Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 vs Celeron M 340

Place in the ranking	3332	531
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	Celeron M	AMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9)
Power efficiency	0.63	47.15
Architecture codename	Banias (2003)	Strix Point (Zen 5) (2024)
Release date	no data	1 October 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 340 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	1 (Single-Core)	8 (Octa-Core)
Threads	1	16 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c
Base clock speed	1.5 GHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1.5 GHz	5.1 GHz
Bus rate	400 MHz	54 MHz
L3 cache	512 KB L2	no data
Chip lithography	130 nm	4 nm
Maximum core temperature	100 °C	no data
64 bit support	-	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	no data
VID voltage range	1.356V	no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 340 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Socket	PPGA478	FP8
Power consumption (TDP)	24.5 Watt	28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 340 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	no data	USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), Secure Processor, SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
AES-NI	-	+
AVX	-	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	-	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	-	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	no data
Idle States	-	no data
Demand Based Switching	-	no data
PAE	32 Bit	no data
FSB parity	-	no data

Security technologies

Celeron M 340 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	-	no data
EDB	-	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 340 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 are enumerated here.

VT-x

no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 340 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types

no data

DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

no data

AMD Radeon 880M

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.14	13.94
Physical cores	1	8
Threads	1	16 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c
Chip lithography	130 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	24 Watt	28 Watt

Celeron M 340 has 16.7% lower power consumption.

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, on the other hand, has a 9857.1% higher aggregate performance score, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 3150% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M 340 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 340 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.