Ryzen 5 3500U vs Celeron M 340

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron M 340
1 core / 1 thread, 24 Watt
0.14
Ryzen 5 3500U
2019
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
4.34
+3000%

Ryzen 5 3500U outperforms Celeron M 340 by a whopping 3000% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 340 and Ryzen 5 3500U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking33321362
Place by popularitynot in top-10052
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesCeleron MAMD Ryzen 5
Power efficiency0.6327.40
Architecture codenameBanias (2003)Picasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020)
Release dateno data6 January 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 340 and Ryzen 5 3500U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads18
Base clock speed1.5 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus typeno dataPCIe 3.0
Bus rate400 MHzno data
Multiplierno data21
L1 cacheno data128K (per core)
L2 cacheno data512K (per core)
L3 cache512 KB L24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography130 nm12 nm
Die sizeno data209.78 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
Number of transistorsno data4940 Million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-+
VID voltage range1.356Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 340 and Ryzen 5 3500U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketPPGA478FP5
Power consumption (TDP)24.5 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 340 and Ryzen 5 3500U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron M 340 and Ryzen 5 3500U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 340 and Ryzen 5 3500U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 340 and Ryzen 5 3500U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1200 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 340 and Ryzen 5 3500U.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data12

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron M 340 0.14
Ryzen 5 3500U 4.34
+3000%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Celeron M 340 125
Ryzen 5 3500U 12.88
+870%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.14 4.34
Physical cores 1 4
Threads 1 8
Chip lithography 130 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 24 Watt 15 Watt

Ryzen 5 3500U has a 3000% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, a 983.3% more advanced lithography process, and 60% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 5 3500U is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M 340 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 340 and Ryzen 5 3500U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 340
Celeron M 340
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
Ryzen 5 3500U

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1 3 votes

Rate Celeron M 340 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 8701 vote

Rate Ryzen 5 3500U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 340 or Ryzen 5 3500U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.