Ryzen 3 3250U vs Celeron J1800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J1800 and Ryzen 3 3250U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated1669
Place by popularitynot in top-10067
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronAMD Ryzen 3
Architecture codenameBay Trail-D (2013)Picasso (2019−2020)
Release date1 November 2013 (10 years ago)6 January 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$72no data
Current price$253 (3.5x MSRP)$430

Detailed specifications

Celeron J1800 and Ryzen 3 3250U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads24
Base clock speed2.41 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.58 GHz3.5 GHz
L1 cache112 KB128K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache1 MB L2 Cache4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm12 nm
Die sizeno data246 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C95 °C
Number of transistorsno data4500 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J1800 and Ryzen 3 3250U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1170FP5
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J1800 and Ryzen 3 3250U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMAno data+
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
SIPP-no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data
RST-no data

Security technologies

Celeron J1800 and Ryzen 3 3250U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Identity Protection-no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J1800 and Ryzen 3 3250U are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J1800 and Ryzen 3 3250U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size8 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support--

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 SeriesAMD Radeon RX Vega 3
Quick Sync Video+no data
Graphics max frequency792 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J1800 and Ryzen 3 3250U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J1800 and Ryzen 3 3250U.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes412

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron J1800 572
Ryzen 3 3250U 3847
+573%

Ryzen 3 3250U outperforms Celeron J1800 by 573% in Passmark.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 November 2013 6 January 2020
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 22 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 15 Watt

We couldn't decide between Celeron J1800 and Ryzen 3 3250U. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J1800 and Ryzen 3 3250U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J1800
Celeron J1800
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
Ryzen 3 3250U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 495 votes

Rate Celeron J1800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1967 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 3250U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J1800 or Ryzen 3 3250U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.