Celeron N3060 vs J1800

Place in the ranking	3051	2987
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	Intel Celeron	Intel Celeron
Power efficiency	3.41	6.62
Architecture codename	Bay Trail-D (2013)	Braswell (2015−2016)
Release date	1 November 2013 (11 years ago)	15 January 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$72	$107

Detailed specifications

Celeron J1800 and Celeron N3060 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	2	2
Base clock speed	2.41 GHz	1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed	2.58 GHz	2.48 GHz
Bus type	no data	IDI
L1 cache	112 KB	no data
L2 cache	1 MB	1 MB
L3 cache	1 MB L2 Cache	0 KB
Chip lithography	22 nm	14 nm
Maximum core temperature	105 °C	90 °C
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J1800 and Celeron N3060 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1 (Uniprocessor)
Socket	FCBGA1170	FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J1800 and Celeron N3060. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI	-	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	+
Turbo Boost Technology	-	-
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	-
Idle States	no data	+
Thermal Monitoring	-	+
Smart Response	no data	-
PAE	36 Bit	no data
GPIO	no data	+
Smart Connect	no data	-
FDI	-	no data
HD Audio	no data	+
RST	-	-

Security technologies

Celeron J1800 and Celeron N3060 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	no data	-
EDB	+	+
Secure Boot	no data	+
Secure Key	no data	+
Identity Protection	-	+
OS Guard	no data	-
Anti-Theft	-	-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J1800 and Celeron N3060 are enumerated here.

VT-d	-	-
VT-x	+	+
VT-i	no data	-
EPT	no data	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J1800 and Celeron N3060. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3	DDR3
Maximum memory size	8 GB	8 GB
Max memory channels	2	2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card Compare	Intel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series	Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) (320 - 700 MHz)
Max video memory	no data	8 GB
Quick Sync Video	+	+
Clear Video	no data	+
Clear Video HD	no data	+
Graphics max frequency	792 MHz	600 MHz
Execution Units	no data	12
InTru 3D	-	-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J1800 and Celeron N3060 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported	2	3
eDP	no data	+
DisplayPort	-	+
HDMI	-	+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron J1800 and Celeron N3060 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX	no data	+
OpenGL	no data	+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J1800 and Celeron N3060.

PCIe version	2.0	2.0
PCI Express lanes	4	4
USB revision	no data	2.0/3.0
Total number of SATA ports	no data	2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports	no data	2
Number of USB ports	no data	5
Integrated LAN	no data	-
UART	no data	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron J1800 0.36

Celeron N3060 0.42
+16.7%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron J1800 573

Celeron N3060 665
+16.1%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.36	0.42
Integrated graphics card	0.77	0.45
Recency	1 November 2013	15 January 2016
Chip lithography	22 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	6 Watt

Celeron J1800 has 71.1% faster integrated GPU.

Celeron N3060, on the other hand, has a 16.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 57.1% more advanced lithography process, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

The Celeron N3060 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J1800 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J1800 and Celeron N3060, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.