Atom E3845 vs A6-7000

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

A6-7000
2014
2 cores / 2 threads
0.65
Atom E3845
2013
4 cores / 4 threads
0.68
+4.6%

Atom E3845 outperforms A6-7000 by 5% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing A6-7000 and Atom E3845 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking26152589
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD KaveriAtom
Architecture codenameKaveri (2014−2015)Bay Trail-I (2013)
Release date1 June 2014 (9 years ago)8 October 2013 (10 years ago)
Current price$450 $781

Technical specs

A6-7000 and Atom E3845 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed2.2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3 GHz1.91 GHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1024 KB512 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm22 nm
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on A6-7000 and Atom E3845 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFT3Intel BGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-7000 and Atom E3845. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA, DDR3-1600 Controllerno data
AES-NI+no data
FMA+no data
AVX+no data
FRTC1no data
PowerTune-no data
TrueAudio+no data
PowerNow+no data
PowerGating+no data
Out-of-band client management+no data
VirusProtect+no data
HSA1no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-7000 and Atom E3845 are enumerated here.

AMD-V1no data
IOMMU 2.0+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-7000 and Atom E3845. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R4 GraphicsIntel HD Graphics
iGPU core count3no data
Enduro+no data
Switchable graphics1no data
UVD+no data
VCE+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A6-7000 and Atom E3845 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A6-7000 and Atom E3845 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan1no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-7000 and Atom E3845.

PCIe version3.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A6-7000 0.65
Atom E3845 0.68
+4.6%

Atom E3845 outperforms A6-7000 by 5% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A6-7000 1010
Atom E3845 1058
+4.8%

Atom E3845 outperforms A6-7000 by 5% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 0.65 0.68
Recency 1 June 2014 8 October 2013
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 28 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 10 Watt

We couldn't decide between A6-7000 and Atom E3845. The differences in performance seem too small.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-7000 and Atom E3845, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-7000
A6-7000
Intel Atom E3845
Atom E3845

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 7 votes

Rate A6-7000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.4 9 votes

Rate Atom E3845 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-7000 or Atom E3845, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.