Celeron J1800 vs 3855U

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 3855U
2015
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.77
+114%
Celeron J1800
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.36

Celeron 3855U outperforms Celeron J1800 by a whopping 114% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 3855U and Celeron J1800 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking26523051
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Celeron
Power efficiency4.863.41
Architecture codenameSkylake (2015−2016)Bay Trail-D (2013)
Release date15 August 2015 (9 years ago)1 November 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$72

Detailed specifications

Celeron 3855U and Celeron J1800 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.6 GHz2.41 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz2.58 GHz
Bus typeOPIno data
Bus rate4 GT/sno data
Multiplier16no data
L1 cache128 KB112 KB
L2 cache512 KB1 MB
L3 cache2 MB1 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography14 nm22 nm
Die size98.57 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
Number of transistors1750 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 3855U and Celeron J1800 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1356FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 3855U and Celeron J1800. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Smart Response+no data
PAEno data36 Bit
FDIno data-
RSTno data-

Security technologies

Celeron 3855U and Celeron J1800 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard-no data
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 3855U and Celeron J1800 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 3855U and Celeron J1800. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1866/2133, LPDDR3-1600/1866, DDR3L-1333/1600DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 510Intel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series
Max video memory32 GBno data
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency900 MHz792 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 3855U and Celeron J1800 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported32
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
DVI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron 3855U and Celeron J1800 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over VGAN/Ano data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron 3855U and Celeron J1800 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.4no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 3855U and Celeron J1800.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes104

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 3855U 0.77
+114%
Celeron J1800 0.36

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 3855U 1219
+113%
Celeron J1800 573

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.77 0.36
Integrated graphics card 1.61 0.77
Recency 15 August 2015 1 November 2013
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 10 Watt

Celeron 3855U has a 113.9% higher aggregate performance score, 109.1% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron J1800, on the other hand, has 50% lower power consumption.

The Celeron 3855U is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J1800 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 3855U and Celeron J1800, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 3855U
Celeron 3855U
Intel Celeron J1800
Celeron J1800

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 31 vote

Rate Celeron 3855U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 539 votes

Rate Celeron J1800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 3855U or Celeron J1800, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.