Pentium G630 vs Celeron G3900E

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron G3900E
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
1.16
+50.6%

Celeron G3900E outperforms Pentium G630 by an impressive 51% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25242818
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.180.08
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency1.400.50
DesignerIntelIntel
Manufacturerno dataIntel
Architecture codenameSkylake (2015−2016)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date2 January 2016 (9 years ago)4 September 2011 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$100

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Celeron G3900E has 125% better value for money than Pentium G630.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Celeron G3900E and Pentium G630 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speedno data2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz2.7 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier24no data
L1 cache128 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB256 KB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB3 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die size98.57 mm2131 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data69 °C
Number of transistors1750 Million504 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G3900E and Pentium G630 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
Socketno dataFCLGA1155
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G3900E and Pentium G630. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Celeron G3900E and Pentium G630 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G3900E and Pentium G630 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G3900E and Pentium G630. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesLPDDR3-1866DDR3
Maximum memory size64 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/s17 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 510Intel HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel Processors
Graphics max frequencyno data1.1 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G3900E and Pentium G630 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G3900E and Pentium G630.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Celeron G3900E 1.16
+50.6%
Pentium G630 0.77

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Celeron G3900E 2034
+50.7%
Samples: 1
Pentium G630 1350
Samples: 833

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.16 0.77
Integrated graphics card 1.40 0.68
Recency 2 January 2016 4 September 2011
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 65 Watt

Celeron G3900E has a 50.6% higher aggregate performance score, 105.9% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 4 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 85.7% lower power consumption.

The Intel Celeron G3900E is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Pentium G630 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron G3900E is a notebook processor while Pentium G630 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G3900E
Celeron G3900E
Intel Pentium G630
Pentium G630

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2 1 vote

Rate Celeron G3900E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 393 votes

Rate Pentium G630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Celeron G3900E and Pentium G630, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.