EPYC 9475F vs Celeron G3930E

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G3930E and EPYC 9475F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Architecture codenameKaby Lake (2016−2019)Turin (2024)
Release date12 June 2017 (7 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$42$7,592

Detailed specifications

Celeron G3930E and EPYC 9475F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)48 (Octatetraconta-Core)
Threads296
Base clock speed2.9 GHz3.65 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
Multiplier29no data
L1 cache128 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data8x 70.6 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data66,520 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G3930E and EPYC 9475F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketFCLGA1151SP5
Power consumption (TDP)54 Watt400 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G3930E and EPYC 9475F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron G3930E and EPYC 9475F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G3930E and EPYC 9475F are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G3930E and EPYC 9475F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2133, DDR3L-1600DDR5
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 610N/A
Max video memory64 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G3930E and EPYC 9475F integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron G3930E and EPYC 9475F integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron G3930E and EPYC 9475F integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.4no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G3930E and EPYC 9475F.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes16128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 June 2017 10 October 2024
Physical cores 2 48
Threads 2 96
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 54 Watt 400 Watt

Celeron G3930E has 640.7% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9475F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, 2300% more physical cores and 4700% more threads, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron G3930E and EPYC 9475F. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Celeron G3930E is a desktop processor while EPYC 9475F is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G3930E and EPYC 9475F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G3930E
Celeron G3930E
AMD EPYC 9475F
EPYC 9475F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron G3930E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9475F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G3930E or EPYC 9475F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.