Pentium E6800 vs Celeron G3900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron G3900
2015
2 cores / 2 threads, 51 Watt
1.40
+86.7%

Celeron G3900 outperforms Pentium E6800 by an impressive 87% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G3900 and Pentium E6800 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking21992639
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.18no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Architecture codenameSkylake (2015−2016)Wolfdale (2008−2010)
Release date19 October 2015 (8 years ago)29 August 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$42$831

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Celeron G3900 and Pentium E6800 have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

Celeron G3900 and Pentium E6800 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.8 GHz3.33 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz0.33 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier28no data
L1 cache128 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB2 MB (shared)
L3 cache2 MB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm45 nm
Die size98.57 mm282 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data74 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)65 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 million228 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.85V-1.3625V

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G3900 and Pentium E6800 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA1151LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)51 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G3900 and Pentium E6800. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Demand Based Switchingno data-
StatusLaunchedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Celeron G3900 and Pentium E6800 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G3900 and Pentium E6800 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G3900 and Pentium E6800. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR1, DDR2, DDR3
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 510no data
Max video memory64 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency950 MHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G3900 and Pentium E6800 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
DVI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron G3900 and Pentium E6800 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over VGAN/Ano data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron G3900 and Pentium E6800 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.4no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G3900 and Pentium E6800.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron G3900 1.40
+86.7%
Pentium E6800 0.75

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron G3900 2165
+86%
Pentium E6800 1164

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron G3900 583
+47.2%
Pentium E6800 396

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron G3900 994
+40%
Pentium E6800 710

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.40 0.75
Recency 19 October 2015 29 August 2010
Chip lithography 14 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 51 Watt 65 Watt

Celeron G3900 has a 86.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 27.5% lower power consumption.

The Celeron G3900 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium E6800 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G3900 and Pentium E6800, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G3900
Celeron G3900
Intel Pentium E6800
Pentium E6800

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 219 votes

Rate Celeron G3900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 40 votes

Rate Pentium E6800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G3900 or Pentium E6800, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.