Celeron N3160 vs G3900
Aggregated performance score
G3900 outperforms N3160 by 86% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Primary Details
Comparing Celeron G3900 and Celeron N3160 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 2091 | 2517 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation | 0.18 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Celeron | Intel Celeron |
| Architecture codename | Skylake (2015−2016) | Braswell (2015−2016) |
| Release date | 1 September 2015 (8 years ago) | 1 April 2016 (8 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $42 | $107 |
| Current price | $105 (2.5x MSRP) | $288 (2.7x MSRP) |
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed Specifications
Celeron G3900 and Celeron N3160 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 2.24 GHz |
| Bus support | 4 × 8 GT/s | no data |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 150 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 90 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 65 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,400 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron G3900 and Celeron N3160 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FCLGA1151 | FCBGA1170 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 51 Watt | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G3900 and Celeron N3160. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | - |
| TSX | - | no data |
| Idle States | + | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | + |
| SIPP | - | - |
| Smart Response | no data | - |
| GPIO | no data | + |
| Smart Connect | no data | - |
| Status | Launched | Launched |
| HD Audio | no data | + |
| RST | no data | - |
Security technologies
Celeron G3900 and Celeron N3160 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | - |
| EDB | + | + |
| Secure Boot | no data | + |
| Secure Key | + | + |
| MPX | - | no data |
| Identity Protection | no data | + |
| SGX | Yes with Intel® ME | no data |
| OS Guard | - | - |
| Anti-Theft | no data | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G3900 and Celeron N3160 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | - |
| VT-x | + | + |
| VT-i | no data | - |
| EPT | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G3900 and Celeron N3160. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3, DDR4 | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | 8 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 34.1 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel HD Graphics 510 | Intel HD Graphics (Braswell) |
| Max video memory | 64 GB | 8 GB |
| Quick Sync Video | + | + |
| Clear Video | + | + |
| Clear Video HD | + | + |
| Graphics max frequency | 950 MHz | 640 MHz |
| Execution Units | no data | 12 |
| InTru 3D | + | - |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G3900 and Celeron N3160 integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 |
| eDP | + | + |
| DisplayPort | + | + |
| HDMI | + | + |
| DVI | + | no data |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron G3900 and Celeron N3160 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
| 4K resolution support | + | no data |
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@24Hz | no data |
| Max resolution over eDP | 4096x2304@60Hz | no data |
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | 4096x2304@60Hz | no data |
| Max resolution over VGA | N/A | no data |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Celeron G3900 and Celeron N3160 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | 12 | + |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G3900 and Celeron N3160.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 4 |
| USB revision | no data | 2.0/3.0 |
| Total number of SATA ports | no data | 2 |
| Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | no data | 2 |
| Number of USB ports | no data | 5 |
| Integrated LAN | no data | - |
| UART | no data | + |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
G3900 outperforms N3160 by 86% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
G3900 outperforms N3160 by 85% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
G3900 outperforms N3160 by 240% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
G3900 outperforms N3160 by 96% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Pros & Cons Summary
| Performance score | 1.41 | 0.76 |
| Integrated graphics card | 1.37 | 0.62 |
| Recency | 1 September 2015 | 1 April 2016 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Cost | $42 | $107 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 51 Watt | 6 Watt |
The Celeron G3900 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N3160 in performance tests.
Note that Celeron G3900 is a desktop processor while Celeron N3160 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G3900 and Celeron N3160, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
