Xeon W-3223 vs Celeron G1830

Aggregate performance score

Celeron G1830
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 53 Watt
0.98
Xeon W-3223
2019
8 cores / 16 threads, 160 Watt
10.70
+992%

Xeon W-3223 outperforms Celeron G1830 by a whopping 992% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G1830 and Xeon W-3223 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2469726
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.2318.61
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataIntel Xeon W
Power efficiency1.726.33
Architecture codenameHaswell (2013−2015)Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release date1 December 2013 (10 years ago)3 June 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$85$749

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon W-3223 has 1413% better value for money than Celeron G1830.

Detailed specifications

Celeron G1830 and Xeon W-3223 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads216
Base clock speed2.8 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz4.2 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rate5 GT/s4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data35
L1 cache64 KB (per core)512 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)8 MB
L3 cache2 MB16.5 MB
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die size177 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data68 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G1830 and Xeon W-3223 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1150FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)53 Watt160 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G1830 and Xeon W-3223. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Celeron G1830 and Xeon W-3223 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Key+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G1830 and Xeon W-3223 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G1830 and Xeon W-3223. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-2666
Maximum memory size32 GB1 TB
Max memory channels26
Maximum memory bandwidth21.3 GB/s128.001 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 4th Generation Intel® Processorsno data
Max video memory1.7 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G1830 and Xeon W-3223 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
DVI+no data
VGA+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron G1830 and Xeon W-3223 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.41920x1080@60Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP2560x1600@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort2560x1600@60Hzno data
Max resolution over VGA1920x1200@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron G1830 and Xeon W-3223 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.1/12no data
OpenGL4.3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G1830 and Xeon W-3223.

PCIe versionUp to 3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1664

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron G1830 0.98
Xeon W-3223 10.70
+992%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron G1830 1560
Xeon W-3223 17003
+990%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.98 10.70
Recency 1 December 2013 3 June 2019
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 16
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 53 Watt 160 Watt

Celeron G1830 has 201.9% lower power consumption.

Xeon W-3223, on the other hand, has a 991.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon W-3223 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G1830 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron G1830 is a desktop processor while Xeon W-3223 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G1830 and Xeon W-3223, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G1830
Celeron G1830
Intel Xeon W-3223
Xeon W-3223

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 10 votes

Rate Celeron G1830 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 6 votes

Rate Xeon W-3223 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G1830 or Xeon W-3223, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.