A4 PRO-7350B vs Celeron G1620T

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron G1620T
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.96
A4 PRO-7350B
2014
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.97
+1%

A4 PRO-7350B outperforms Celeron G1620T by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G1620T and A4 PRO-7350B processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25002495
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.40no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency2.581.40
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Kaveri (2014−2015)
Release date1 September 2013 (11 years ago)31 July 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$42no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron G1620T and A4 PRO-7350B basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.4 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz3.8 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1024 KB
L3 cache2 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography22 nm28 nm
Die size94 mm2245 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data70 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)65 °C72 °C
Number of transistorsno data2,411 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G1620T and A4 PRO-7350B compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1155FM2+
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G1620T and A4 PRO-7350B. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX++
PowerTune-+
DualGraphics-+
TrueAudio-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
Out-of-band client management-+
VirusProtect-+
RAID-+
HSA-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
My WiFi-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-

Security technologies

Celeron G1620T and A4 PRO-7350B technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key-no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G1620T and A4 PRO-7350B are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G1620T and A4 PRO-7350B. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3-1866
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel ProcessorsAMD Radeon R5 Graphics
iGPU core countno data3
จำนวนพาธไลน์no data192
UVD-+
VCE-+
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G1620T and A4 PRO-7350B integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron G1620T and A4 PRO-7350B integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G1620T and A4 PRO-7350B.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron G1620T 0.96
A4 PRO-7350B 0.97
+1%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron G1620T 1532
A4 PRO-7350B 1544
+0.8%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.96 0.97
Recency 1 September 2013 31 July 2014
Chip lithography 22 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 65 Watt

Celeron G1620T has a 27.3% more advanced lithography process, and 85.7% lower power consumption.

A4 PRO-7350B, on the other hand, has a 1% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 10 months.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Celeron G1620T and A4 PRO-7350B.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G1620T and A4 PRO-7350B, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G1620T
Celeron G1620T
AMD A4 PRO-7350B
A4 PRO-7350B

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 5 votes

Rate Celeron G1620T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 3 votes

Rate A4 PRO-7350B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G1620T or A4 PRO-7350B, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.