Microsoft SQ1 vs Celeron G1101

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

Celeron G1101
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 73 Watt
0.68
Microsoft SQ1
2019
8 cores / 8 threads, 3000 Watt
3.67
+440%

Microsoft SQ1 outperforms Celeron G1101 by a whopping 440% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G1101 and Microsoft SQ1 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27191487
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.97no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataQualcomm Snapdragon
Power efficiency0.880.12
Architecture codenameClarkdale (2010−2011)Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 495) (2019)
Release date7 January 2010 (14 years ago)2 October 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$85no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron G1101 and Microsoft SQ1 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speed2.26 GHzno data
Boost clock speed0.27 GHz3 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)no data
L3 cache2 MB (shared)2 MB
Chip lithography32 nm7 nm
Die size81 mm2no data
Number of transistors382 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G1101 and Microsoft SQ1 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA1156no data
Power consumption (TDP)73 Watt3000 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G1101 and Microsoft SQ1. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

vPro-no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI+no data

Security technologies

Celeron G1101 and Microsoft SQ1 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G1101 and Microsoft SQ1 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G1101 and Microsoft SQ1. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size16.38 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth17 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HDQualcomm Adreno 685

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G1101 and Microsoft SQ1 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G1101 and Microsoft SQ1.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes1no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron G1101 0.68
Microsoft SQ1 3.67
+440%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron G1101 1086
Microsoft SQ1 5822
+436%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.68 3.67
Recency 7 January 2010 2 October 2019
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 8
Chip lithography 32 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 73 Watt 3000 Watt

Celeron G1101 has 4009.6% lower power consumption.

Microsoft SQ1, on the other hand, has a 439.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 357.1% more advanced lithography process.

The Microsoft SQ1 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G1101 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron G1101 is a desktop processor while Microsoft SQ1 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G1101 and Microsoft SQ1, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G1101
Celeron G1101
Microsoft SQ1
SQ1

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Celeron G1101 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 58 votes

Rate Microsoft SQ1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G1101 or Microsoft SQ1, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.