A10-6700T vs Solo T1200
Primary details
Comparing Core Solo T1200 and A10-6700T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | 2166 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
Series | Core Solo | no data |
Power efficiency | no data | 3.04 |
Architecture codename | Yonah (2005−2006) | Richland (2013−2014) |
Release date | January 2006 (18 years ago) | 16 September 2013 (11 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core Solo T1200 and A10-6700T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
Threads | 1 | 4 |
Base clock speed | no data | 2.5 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
Bus rate | 667 MHz | no data |
L1 cache | 64 KB | 192 KB |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 4096 KB |
L3 cache | 0 KB | 0 KB |
Chip lithography | 65 nm | 32 nm |
Die size | 90 mm2 | 246 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | no data | 71 °C |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 71 °C |
Number of transistors | 151 million | 1,178 million |
64 bit support | - | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core Solo T1200 and A10-6700T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | 479 | FM2 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 27 Watt | 45 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Solo T1200 and A10-6700T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | - | + |
FMA | - | FMA4 |
AVX | - | AVX |
PowerNow | - | + |
PowerGating | - | + |
VirusProtect | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Solo T1200 and A10-6700T are enumerated here.
AMD-V | - | + |
IOMMU 2.0 | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Solo T1200 and A10-6700T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR1 | DDR3-1866 |
Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon™ HD 8650D |
Number of pipelines | no data | 384 |
Enduro | - | + |
Switchable graphics | - | + |
UVD | - | + |
VCE | - | + |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Core Solo T1200 and A10-6700T integrated GPUs.
DisplayPort | - | + |
HDMI | - | + |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Core Solo T1200 and A10-6700T integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | no data | DirectX® 11 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Solo T1200 and A10-6700T.
PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 1 | 4 |
Threads | 1 | 4 |
Chip lithography | 65 nm | 32 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 27 Watt | 45 Watt |
Solo T1200 has 66.7% lower power consumption.
A10-6700T, on the other hand, has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 103.1% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Core Solo T1200 and A10-6700T. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Core Solo T1200 is a notebook processor while A10-6700T is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core Solo T1200 and A10-6700T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.