Pentium 917 vs Celeron E3300
Primary details
Comparing Celeron E3300 and Pentium 917 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2871 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.83 | no data |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
Series | no data | Intel Pentium |
Power efficiency | 0.73 | no data |
Architecture codename | Wolfdale (2008−2010) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
Release date | 30 August 2009 (15 years ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $70 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Celeron E3300 and Pentium 917 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 2 | 2 |
Base clock speed | 2.5 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
Bus type | no data | DMI 2.0 |
Bus rate | no data | 4 × 5 GT/s |
L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 1 MB (shared) | 512 KB |
L3 cache | 0 KB | 2 MB |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 32 nm |
Die size | 82 mm2 | 131 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 74 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 228 million | 504 Million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
VID voltage range | 0.85V-1.3625V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron E3300 and Pentium 917 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
Socket | LGA775 | no data |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 17 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron E3300 and Pentium 917. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
FMA | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
Idle States | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Security technologies
Celeron E3300 and Pentium 917 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | - | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron E3300 and Pentium 917 are enumerated here.
VT-d | - | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron E3300 and Pentium 917. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | DDR3-1333 |
Maximum memory size | no data | 16 GB |
Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 21.335 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron E3300 and Pentium 917.
PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 32 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 17 Watt |
Pentium 917 has a 40.6% more advanced lithography process, and 282.4% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Celeron E3300 and Pentium 917. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Celeron E3300 is a desktop processor while Pentium 917 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron E3300 and Pentium 917, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.