Athlon 64 X2 6000+ vs Celeron E3200

Primary details

Comparing Celeron E3200 and Athlon 64 X2 6000+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	2715	2667
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	2.88	1.10
Market segment	Desktop processor	Desktop processor
Architecture codename	Wolfdale (2008−2010)	Windsor (2006−2009)
Release date	August 2009 (14 years ago)	August 2007 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$52	no data
Current price	$63 (1.2x MSRP)	$53

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Celeron E3200 has 162% better value for money than Athlon 64 X2 6000+.

Detailed specifications

Celeron E3200 and Athlon 64 X2 6000+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	2	2
Base clock speed	2.4 GHz	no data
Boost clock speed	2.4 GHz	3.1 GHz
L1 cache	64 KB (per core)	256 KB
L2 cache	1 MB (shared)	512K
L3 cache	0 KB	0 KB
Chip lithography	45 nm	90 nm
Die size	82 mm2	220 mm2
Maximum core temperature	74 °C	no data
Number of transistors	228 million	227 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
Unlocked multiplier	No	No
VID voltage range	0.85V-1.3625V	no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron E3200 and Athlon 64 X2 6000+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	LGA775	AM2
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron E3200 and Athlon 64 X2 6000+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI	-	no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	-	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	no data
Idle States	+	no data
Thermal Monitoring	+	no data
Status	Discontinued	no data

Security technologies

Celeron E3200 and Athlon 64 X2 6000+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	-	no data
EDB	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron E3200 and Athlon 64 X2 6000+ are enumerated here.

VT-d	-	no data
VT-x	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron E3200 and Athlon 64 X2 6000+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types

DDR1, DDR2, DDR3

no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon 64 X2 6000+ outperforms Celeron E3200 by 11% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	0.54	0.60
Chip lithography	45 nm	90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	125 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron E3200 and Athlon 64 X2 6000+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---