EPYC 7H12 vs Celeron Dual-Core T1600

Primary details

Comparing Celeron Dual-Core T1600 and EPYC 7H12 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	2684	37
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	21.91
Market segment	Laptop	Server
Series	Intel Celeron Dual-Core	AMD EPYC
Architecture codename	Merom (2006−2008)	Zen 2 (2019−2020)
Release date	1 May 2008 (16 years ago)	18 September 2019 (4 years ago)
Current price	$66	$1970

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Detailed specifications

Celeron Dual-Core T1600 and EPYC 7H12 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads	2	128
Base clock speed	no data	2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed	1.66 GHz	3.3 GHz
Bus support	667 MHz	no data
L1 cache	no data	96K (per core)
L2 cache	1 MB	512K (per core)
L3 cache	no data	256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	65 nm	7 nm, 14 nm
Die size	143 mm2	192 mm2
Number of transistors	291 Million	4,800 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	+
Unlocked multiplier	No	Yes

Compatibility

Information on Celeron Dual-Core T1600 and EPYC 7H12 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	no data	2 (Multiprocessor)
Socket	PPGA478	TR4
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1600 and EPYC 7H12. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI	no data	+
AVX	no data	+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1600 and EPYC 7H12 are enumerated here.

AMD-V

no data

+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1600 and EPYC 7H12. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	no data	DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size	no data	4 TiB
Max memory channels	no data	8
Maximum memory bandwidth	no data	204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support	no data	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7H12 outperforms Celeron Dual-Core T1600 by 7280% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	0.61	45.02
Recency	1 May 2008	18 September 2019
Physical cores	2	64
Threads	2	128
Chip lithography	65 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	280 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron Dual-Core T1600 and EPYC 7H12, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---