Atom Z3735G vs Celeron B820

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron B820 and Atom Z3735G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2750not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Bay Trail-T (2013−2014)
Release date1 July 2012 (11 years ago)9 April 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$86$17
Current price$34 (0.4x MSRP)no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron B820 and Atom Z3735G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed1.7 GHz1.33 GHz
Boost clock speed1.7 GHz1.83 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)56K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)2 MB
L3 cache2 MB (shared)2 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography32 nm22 nm
Die size131 mm2112 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors504 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron B820 and Atom Z3735G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCPGA988,PGA988UTFCBGA592
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt2 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron B820 and Atom Z3735G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI-+
FMA+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFi-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Celeron B820 and Atom Z3735G technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Anti-Theft-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron B820 and Atom Z3735G are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron B820 and Atom Z3735G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size16 GB1 GB
Max memory channels21
Maximum memory bandwidth21.3 GB/s5.3 GB/s
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® ProcessorsIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHz646 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron B820 and Atom Z3735G integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron B820 and Atom Z3735G.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron B820 820
+6.2%
Atom Z3735G 772

Celeron B820 outperforms Atom Z3735G by 6% in Passmark.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 July 2012 9 April 2014
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Cost $86 $17
Chip lithography 32 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 2 Watt

We couldn't decide between Celeron B820 and Atom Z3735G. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron B820 and Atom Z3735G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron B820
Celeron B820
Intel Atom Z3735G
Atom Z3735G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 130 votes

Rate Celeron B820 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 58 votes

Rate Atom Z3735G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron B820 or Atom Z3735G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.