Ryzen Threadripper 1956X vs Celeron B810

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron B810 and Ryzen Threadripper 1956X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2884not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency1.33no data
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Zen (2017−2020)
Release date14 March 2011 (13 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$86no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron B810 and Ryzen Threadripper 1956X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads2no data
Base clock speed1.6 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/sno data
Multiplier16no data
L1 cache128 KB128 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)32768 KB
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size131 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors504 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron B810 and Ryzen Threadripper 1956X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketPGA988SP3r2
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron B810 and Ryzen Threadripper 1956X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
FMA+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
My WiFi-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Celeron B810 and Ryzen Threadripper 1956X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron B810 and Ryzen Threadripper 1956X are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron B810 and Ryzen Threadripper 1956X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size16.6 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® Processorsno data
Graphics max frequency950 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron B810 and Ryzen Threadripper 1956X integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron B810 and Ryzen Threadripper 1956X.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 12
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 125 Watt

Celeron B810 has 257.1% lower power consumption.

Ryzen Threadripper 1956X, on the other hand, has 500% more physical cores, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron B810 and Ryzen Threadripper 1956X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron B810 is a notebook processor while Ryzen Threadripper 1956X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron B810 and Ryzen Threadripper 1956X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron B810
Celeron B810
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1956X
Ryzen Threadripper 1956X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 5 votes

Rate Celeron B810 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 1956X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron B810 or Ryzen Threadripper 1956X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.