Athlon 64 2000+ vs Celeron B710

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron B710 and Athlon 64 2000+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Lima (2008−2009)
Release date15 March 2011 (13 years ago)June 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$70no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron B710 and Athlon 64 2000+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz1 GHz
Bus support4 × 5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB128 KB
L2 cache256 KB512 KB
L3 cache1.5 MB0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm65 nm
Die size131 mm277 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors504 million122 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron B710 and Athlon 64 2000+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketSocket G2AM2
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt8 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron B710 and Athlon 64 2000+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

FMA+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron B710 and Athlon 64 2000+ are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron B710 and Athlon 64 2000+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron B710 and Athlon 64 2000+.

PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron B710 106
Athlon 64 2000+ 154
+45.3%

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 32 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 8 Watt

Celeron B710 has a 103.1% more advanced lithography process.

Athlon 64 2000+, on the other hand, has 337.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron B710 and Athlon 64 2000+. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron B710 is a notebook processor while Athlon 64 2000+ is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron B710 and Athlon 64 2000+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron B710
Celeron B710
AMD Athlon 64 2000+
Athlon 64 2000+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 77 votes

Rate Celeron B710 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 12 votes

Rate Athlon 64 2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron B710 or Athlon 64 2000+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.