Ryzen Threadripper 3970X vs Celeron 847

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 847 and Ryzen Threadripper 3970X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated54
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data22.86
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel CeleronAMD Ryzen Threadripper
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Matisse (2019−2020)
Release date19 June 2011 (13 years ago)25 November 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$134$1,999
Current price$93 (0.7x MSRP)$1675 (0.8x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 847 and Ryzen Threadripper 3970X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads264
Base clock speed1.1 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed1.1 GHz4.5 GHz
Bus supportno data8 × 16 GT/s
L1 cache64K (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)128 MB
Chip lithography32 nm7 nm, 12 nm
Die size131 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors504 million19,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 847 and Ryzen Threadripper 3970X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1023TR4
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 847 and Ryzen Threadripper 3970X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI-+
FMA+no data
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Celeron 847 and Ryzen Threadripper 3970X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 847 and Ryzen Threadripper 3970X are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 847 and Ryzen Threadripper 3970X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size16 GB256 GB
Max memory channels24
Maximum memory bandwidth21.3 GB/s102.403 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)-
Clear Video HD--
Graphics max frequency800 MHz-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 847 and Ryzen Threadripper 3970X integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2-
eDP+-
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+-
CRT+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 847 and Ryzen Threadripper 3970X.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron 847 484
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 63242
+12967%

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms Celeron 847 by 12967% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron 847 157
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 1636
+942%

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms Celeron 847 by 942% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron 847 260
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 13982
+5278%

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms Celeron 847 by 5278% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 June 2011 25 November 2019
Physical cores 2 32
Threads 2 64
Cost $134 $1999
Chip lithography 32 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 280 Watt

We couldn't decide between Celeron 847 and Ryzen Threadripper 3970X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron 847 is a notebook processor while Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 847 and Ryzen Threadripper 3970X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 847
Celeron 847
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 306 votes

Rate Celeron 847 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 343 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 3970X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 847 or Ryzen Threadripper 3970X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.