Ryzen 5 3600XT vs Celeron 847

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 847 and Ryzen 5 3600XT processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated654
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data24.41
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel CeleronAMD Ryzen 5
Power efficiencyno data11.69
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Matisse (2019−2020)
Release date19 June 2011 (13 years ago)16 June 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$134$249

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 847 and Ryzen 5 3600XT basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads212
Base clock speed1.1 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed1.1 GHz4.5 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/sno data
Multiplier11no data
L1 cache64K (per core)384 KB
L2 cache256K (per core)3 MB
L3 cache2 MB (shared)32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm7 nm, 12 nm
Die size131 mm274 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
Number of transistors504 million3,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 847 and Ryzen 5 3600XT compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1023AM4
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 847 and Ryzen 5 3600XT. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI-+
FMA+-
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron 847 and Ryzen 5 3600XT technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 847 and Ryzen 5 3600XT are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 847 and Ryzen 5 3600XT. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size16 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/s51.196 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)-
Clear Video HD--
Graphics max frequency800 MHz-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 847 and Ryzen 5 3600XT integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2-
eDP+-
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+-
CRT+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 847 and Ryzen 5 3600XT.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 847 480
Ryzen 5 3600XT 18641
+3784%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron 847 157
Ryzen 5 3600XT 1721
+996%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron 847 262
Ryzen 5 3600XT 7188
+2644%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 June 2011 16 June 2020
Physical cores 2 6
Threads 2 12
Chip lithography 32 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 95 Watt

Celeron 847 has 458.8% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 5 3600XT, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 357.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron 847 and Ryzen 5 3600XT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron 847 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 5 3600XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 847 and Ryzen 5 3600XT, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 847
Celeron 847
AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT
Ryzen 5 3600XT

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 355 votes

Rate Celeron 847 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 537 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 3600XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 847 or Ryzen 5 3600XT, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.