E-240 vs Celeron 807UE

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 807UE
1 core / 1 thread, 10 Watt
0.15
+25%

Celeron 807UE outperforms E-240 by a significant 25% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 807UE and E-240 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking33153354
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronAMD E-Series
Power efficiency1.420.63
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Zacate (2011−2013)
Release dateno data4 January 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron 807UE and E-240 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Boost clock speed1 GHz1.5 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/sno data
Multiplier10no data
L1 cache64 KB64 KB
L2 cache256 KB512 KB
L3 cache1.5 MB0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm40 nm
Die size131 mm275 mm2
Number of transistors504 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 807UE and E-240 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
Socketno dataFT1 BGA 413-Ball
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 807UE and E-240. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V
FMA+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 807UE and E-240 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 807UE and E-240. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1333DDR3 Single-channel
Maximum memory size4 GBno data
Max memory channels1no data
Maximum memory bandwidth10.662 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)AMD Radeon HD 6310

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 807UE 0.15
+25%
E-240 0.12

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 807UE 241
+23.6%
E-240 195

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.15 0.12
Integrated graphics card 0.34 0.32
Chip lithography 32 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 18 Watt

Celeron 807UE has a 25% higher aggregate performance score, 6.3% faster integrated GPU, a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 80% lower power consumption.

The Celeron 807UE is our recommended choice as it beats the E-240 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 807UE and E-240, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 807UE
Celeron 807UE
AMD E-240
E-240

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron 807UE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 55 votes

Rate E-240 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 807UE or E-240, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.