Ryzen 9 9900X vs Celeron 6305

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 6305
2020
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
1.36
Ryzen 9 9900X
2024
12 cores / 24 threads, 120 Watt
35.78
+2531%

Ryzen 9 9900X outperforms Celeron 6305 by a whopping 2531% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 6305 and Ryzen 9 9900X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2254107
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data66.57
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Tiger Lakeno data
Power efficiency8.2727.19
Architecture codenameTiger Lake-U (2020)Granite Ridge (2024)
Release date1 September 2020 (4 years ago)15 August 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 6305 and Ryzen 9 9900X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads224
Base clock speedno data4.4 GHz
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz5.6 GHz
Bus rate4 GT/sno data
L1 cache160 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache2.5 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm SuperFin4 nm
Die sizeno data2x 70.6 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C95 °C
Number of transistorsno data16,630 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 6305 and Ryzen 9 9900X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1449AM5
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 6305 and Ryzen 9 9900X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
AES-NI++
AVX++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Celeron 6305 and Ryzen 9 9900X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 6305 and Ryzen 9 9900X are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 6305 and Ryzen 9 9900X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® UHD Graphics for 11th Gen Intel® ProcessorsAMD Radeon Graphics
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.25 GHzno data
Execution Units48no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 6305 and Ryzen 9 9900X integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported4no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron 6305 and Ryzen 9 9900X integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680x4320@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron 6305 and Ryzen 9 9900X integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 6305 and Ryzen 9 9900X.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data24

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 6305 1.36
Ryzen 9 9900X 35.78
+2531%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 6305 2080
Ryzen 9 9900X 54752
+2532%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Celeron 6305 1198
Ryzen 9 9900X 21384
+1685%

Blender(-)

Celeron 6305 2834
+2822%
Ryzen 9 9900X 97

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Celeron 6305 638
Ryzen 9 9900X 2544
+299%

7-Zip Single

Celeron 6305 2238
Ryzen 9 9900X 8020
+258%

7-Zip

Celeron 6305 4263
Ryzen 9 9900X 122724
+2779%

WebXPRT 3

Celeron 6305 101
Ryzen 9 9900X 398
+295%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.36 35.78
Recency 1 September 2020 15 August 2024
Physical cores 2 12
Threads 2 24
Chip lithography 10 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 120 Watt

Celeron 6305 has 700% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 9 9900X, on the other hand, has a 2530.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 9 9900X is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 6305 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron 6305 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 9 9900X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 6305 and Ryzen 9 9900X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 6305
Celeron 6305
AMD Ryzen 9 9900X
Ryzen 9 9900X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 147 votes

Rate Celeron 6305 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 114 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 9900X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 6305 or Ryzen 9 9900X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.