Athlon 64 FX-57 vs Celeron 445
Primary details
Comparing Celeron 445 and Athlon 64 FX-57 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 3092 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | no data | 0.30 |
| Architecture codename | Conroe-CL (2008) | San Diego (2001−2005) |
| Release date | May 2008 (16 years ago) | June 2005 (19 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron 445 and Athlon 64 FX-57 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 1.86 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 1.87 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 90 nm |
| Die size | 76 mm2 | 115 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 105 million | 114 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 445 and Athlon 64 FX-57 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | 771 | 939 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 104 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 445 and Athlon 64 FX-57. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| FSB parity | + | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron 445 and Athlon 64 FX-57 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 445 and Athlon 64 FX-57 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 445 and Athlon 64 FX-57. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR2 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 104 Watt |
Celeron 445 has a 38.5% more advanced lithography process, and 60% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Celeron 445 and Athlon 64 FX-57. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 445 and Athlon 64 FX-57, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
