Athlon 64 FX-57 vs Sempron 145

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Sempron 145 and Athlon 64 FX-57 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameSargas (2009−2011)San Diego (2001−2005)
Release date1 September 2010 (14 years ago)June 2005 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$95no data

Detailed specifications

Sempron 145 and Athlon 64 FX-57 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Base clock speed2.8 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz2.8 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm90 nm
Die size117 mm2115 mm2
Number of transistors234 million114 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Sempron 145 and Athlon 64 FX-57 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3939
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt104 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Sempron 145 and Athlon 64 FX-57. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Sempron 145 and Athlon 64 FX-57.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Sempron 145 518
+0.2%
Athlon 64 FX-57 517

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 45 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 104 Watt

Sempron 145 has a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 131.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Sempron 145 and Athlon 64 FX-57. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Sempron 145 and Athlon 64 FX-57, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Sempron 145
Sempron 145
AMD Athlon 64 FX-57
Athlon 64 FX-57

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 230 votes

Rate Sempron 145 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Athlon 64 FX-57 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Sempron 145 or Athlon 64 FX-57, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.