Celeron J1800 vs 3965U
Primary details
Comparing Celeron 3965U and Celeron J1800 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2398 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | Intel Celeron | Intel Celeron |
Power efficiency | 6.87 | no data |
Architecture codename | Kaby Lake-U (2017) | Bay Trail-D (2013) |
Release date | 3 January 2017 (7 years ago) | 1 November 2013 (11 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $107 | $72 |
Detailed specifications
Celeron 3965U and Celeron J1800 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 2 | 2 |
Base clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 2.41 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 2.58 GHz |
Bus type | OPI | no data |
Bus rate | 4 GT/s | no data |
Multiplier | 22 | no data |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 112 KB |
L2 cache | 512 KB | 1 MB |
L3 cache | 2 MB (shared) | 1 MB L2 Cache |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 22 nm |
Die size | 98.7 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 105 °C |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 3965U and Celeron J1800 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
Socket | FCBGA1356,FPBGA1356 | FCBGA1170 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 10 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 3965U and Celeron J1800. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | no data |
AES-NI | + | - |
AVX | + | - |
vPro | + | no data |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Speed Shift | + | no data |
My WiFi | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | - |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | - |
Idle States | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Flex Memory Access | + | no data |
Smart Response | + | no data |
PAE | no data | 36 Bit |
FDI | no data | - |
RST | no data | - |
Security technologies
Celeron 3965U and Celeron J1800 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | - | no data |
EDB | + | + |
Secure Key | + | no data |
MPX | + | - |
SGX | Yes with Intel® ME | no data |
OS Guard | + | no data |
Anti-Theft | no data | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 3965U and Celeron J1800 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
VT-d | + | - |
VT-x | + | + |
EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 3965U and Celeron J1800. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3, DDR4 | DDR3 |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB | 8 GB |
Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 34.134 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics 610 | Intel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series |
Max video memory | 32 GB | no data |
Quick Sync Video | + | + |
Clear Video | + | no data |
Clear Video HD | + | no data |
Graphics max frequency | 900 MHz | 792 MHz |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 3965U and Celeron J1800 integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | 3 | 2 |
eDP | + | no data |
DisplayPort | + | - |
HDMI | + | - |
DVI | + | no data |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron 3965U and Celeron J1800 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
4K resolution support | + | no data |
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@24Hz | no data |
Max resolution over eDP | 4096x2304@60Hz | no data |
Max resolution over DisplayPort | 4096x2304@60Hz | no data |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Celeron 3965U and Celeron J1800 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | 12 | no data |
OpenGL | 4.4 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 3965U and Celeron J1800.
PCIe version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 16 | 4 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 3 January 2017 | 1 November 2013 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 22 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 10 Watt |
Celeron 3965U has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.
Celeron J1800, on the other hand, has 50% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Celeron 3965U and Celeron J1800. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 3965U and Celeron J1800, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.