Celeron 3867U vs J1800

Place in the ranking	3050	2531
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	Intel Celeron	Intel Celeron
Power efficiency	3.40	5.80
Architecture codename	Bay Trail-D (2013)	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
Release date	1 November 2013 (11 years ago)	1 March 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$72	$107

Detailed specifications

Celeron J1800 and Celeron 3867U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	2	2
Base clock speed	2.41 GHz	1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed	2.58 GHz	1.8 GHz
Bus rate	no data	4 GT/s
L1 cache	112 KB	128 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	512 KB
L3 cache	1 MB L2 Cache	2 MB
Chip lithography	22 nm	14 nm
Maximum core temperature	105 °C	100 °C
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J1800 and Celeron 3867U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	FCBGA1170	FCBGA1356,FC-BGA1356
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J1800 and Celeron 3867U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	no data	Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI	-	+
AVX	-	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	+
Speed Shift	no data	+
My WiFi	no data	+
Turbo Boost Technology	-	-
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	+
Idle States	no data	+
Thermal Monitoring	-	+
Flex Memory Access	no data	+
Smart Response	no data	+
PAE	36 Bit	no data
FDI	-	no data
RST	-	no data

Security technologies

Celeron J1800 and Celeron 3867U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	no data	-
EDB	+	+
Secure Key	no data	+
MPX	-	+
SGX	no data	Yes with Intel® ME
OS Guard	no data	+
Anti-Theft	-	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J1800 and Celeron 3867U are enumerated here.

AMD-V	-	+
VT-d	-	+
VT-x	+	+
EPT	no data	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J1800 and Celeron 3867U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3	DDR3, DDR4
Maximum memory size	8 GB	32 GB
Max memory channels	2	2
Maximum memory bandwidth	no data	34.1 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card Compare	Intel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series	Intel HD Graphics 610
Max video memory	no data	32 GB
Quick Sync Video	+	+
Clear Video	no data	+
Clear Video HD	no data	+
Graphics max frequency	792 MHz	900 MHz
Execution Units	no data	12

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J1800 and Celeron 3867U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported	2	3
eDP	no data	+
DisplayPort	-	+
HDMI	-	+
DVI	no data	+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron J1800 and Celeron 3867U integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support	no data	+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4	no data	4096x2304@24Hz
Max resolution over eDP	no data	4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort	no data	4096x2304@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron J1800 and Celeron 3867U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX	no data	12
OpenGL	no data	4.4

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J1800 and Celeron 3867U.

PCIe version	2.0	3.0
PCI Express lanes	4	12

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron J1800 0.36

Celeron 3867U 0.92
+156%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron J1800 574

Celeron 3867U 1467
+156%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.36	0.92
Integrated graphics card	0.77	1.85
Recency	1 November 2013	1 March 2019
Chip lithography	22 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	15 Watt

Celeron J1800 has 50% lower power consumption.

Celeron 3867U, on the other hand, has a 155.6% higher aggregate performance score, 140.3% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

The Celeron 3867U is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J1800 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J1800 and Celeron 3867U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.