Atom x7-Z8750 vs Celeron 3955U

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 3955U
2015
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.92
+15%

Celeron 3955U outperforms Atom x7-Z8750 by a moderate 15% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking26972777
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeron7x Intel Atom
Power efficiency5.92no data
DesignerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameSkylake (2015−2016)Cherry Trail (2015−2016)
Release date15 August 2015 (9 years ago)1 April 2016 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$37

Detailed specifications

Celeron 3955U and Atom x7-Z8750 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed2 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz2.56 GHz
Bus typeOPIno data
Bus rate4 GT/sno data
Multiplier2016
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache512 KB2 MB
L3 cache2 MB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size98.57 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C90 °C
Number of transistors1750 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 3955U and Atom x7-Z8750 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1356UTFCBGA1380
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 3955U and Atom x7-Z8750. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Smart Response+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-

Security technologies

Celeron 3955U and Atom x7-Z8750 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Bootno data+
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection++
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 3955U and Atom x7-Z8750 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 3955U and Atom x7-Z8750. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1866/2133, LPDDR3-1600/1866, DDR3L-1333/1600DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/s25.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 510Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell) (400 - 600 MHz)
Max video memory32 GB8 GB
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency900 MHz600 MHz
Execution Unitsno data16

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 3955U and Atom x7-Z8750 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
DVI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron 3955U and Atom x7-Z8750 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hz3840x2160
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hz2560x1600
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over VGAN/Ano data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron 3955U and Atom x7-Z8750 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.4no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 3955U and Atom x7-Z8750.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes122
USB revisionno data3.0
Number of USB portsno data3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Celeron 3955U 0.92
+15%
Atom x7-Z8750 0.80

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Celeron 3955U 1478
+14.2%
Atom x7-Z8750 1294

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron 3955U 426
+138%
Atom x7-Z8750 179

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron 3955U 754
+47.3%
Atom x7-Z8750 512

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.92 0.80
Integrated graphics card 1.54 0.71
Recency 15 August 2015 1 April 2016
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4

Celeron 3955U has a 15% higher aggregate performance score, and 116.9% faster integrated GPU.

Atom x7-Z8750, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 months, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

The Intel Celeron 3955U is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom x7-Z8750 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 3955U
Celeron 3955U
Intel Atom x7-Z8750
Atom x7-Z8750

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 29 votes

Rate Celeron 3955U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 21 votes

Rate Atom x7-Z8750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Celeron 3955U and Atom x7-Z8750, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.