Athlon Gold 7220C vs Celeron 827
Primary details
Comparing Celeron 827 and Athlon Gold 7220C processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Celeron | AMD Mendocino (Zen 2, Ryzen 7020) |
| Architecture codename | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Mendocino (Zen 2) (2022−2023) |
| Release date | no data | 23 May 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron 827 and Athlon Gold 7220C basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 1 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.4 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Bus type | DMI 2.0 | no data |
| Bus rate | 4 × 5 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 14 | no data |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 256 KB | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 1.5 MB | 4 MB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 6 nm |
| Die size | 131 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 504 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 827 and Athlon Gold 7220C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 17 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 827 and Athlon Gold 7220C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT |
| FMA | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 827 and Athlon Gold 7220C are enumerated here.
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 827 and Athlon Gold 7220C. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3-1333 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 21.335 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) | AMD Radeon 610M ( - 1900 MHz) |
Pros & cons summary
| Integrated graphics card | 0.34 | 2.85 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 2 |
| Threads | 1 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 6 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 17 Watt | 15 Watt |
Athlon Gold 7220C has 738.2% faster integrated GPU, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 433.3% more advanced lithography process, and 13.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Celeron 827 and Athlon Gold 7220C. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 827 and Athlon Gold 7220C, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
