Celeron 1017U vs 3855U

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 3855U
2015
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.77
Celeron 1017U
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 17 Watt
0.95
+23.4%

Celeron 1017U outperforms Celeron 3855U by a significant 23% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 3855U and Celeron 1017U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking26342498
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Celeron
Power efficiency4.865.29
Architecture codenameSkylake (2015−2016)Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Release date15 August 2015 (9 years ago)1 July 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 3855U and Celeron 1017U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.6 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus typeOPIno data
Bus rate4 GT/s5 GT/s
Multiplier16no data
L1 cache128 KB128 KB
L2 cache512 KB512 KB
L3 cache2 MB2 MB
Chip lithography14 nm22 nm
Die size98.57 mm294 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
Number of transistors1750 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 3855U and Celeron 1017U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1356FCBGA1023
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 3855U and Celeron 1017U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFi+-
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access++
Smart Response+no data
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Celeron 3855U and Celeron 1017U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard-no data
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 3855U and Celeron 1017U are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 3855U and Celeron 1017U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1866/2133, LPDDR3-1600/1866, DDR3L-1333/1600DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/s25.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 510Intel® HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel® Processors
Max video memory32 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+-
Graphics max frequency900 MHz1 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 3855U and Celeron 1017U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
DVI+no data
SDVOno data+
CRTno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron 3855U and Celeron 1017U integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over VGAN/Ano data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron 3855U and Celeron 1017U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.4no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 3855U and Celeron 1017U.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes1016

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 3855U 0.77
Celeron 1017U 0.95
+23.4%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 3855U 1219
Celeron 1017U 1508
+23.7%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron 3855U 315
+19.8%
Celeron 1017U 263

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron 3855U 538
+18.5%
Celeron 1017U 454

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.77 0.95
Recency 15 August 2015 1 July 2013
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 17 Watt

Celeron 3855U has an age advantage of 2 years, a 57.1% more advanced lithography process, and 13.3% lower power consumption.

Celeron 1017U, on the other hand, has a 23.4% higher aggregate performance score.

The Celeron 1017U is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 3855U in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 3855U and Celeron 1017U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 3855U
Celeron 3855U
Intel Celeron 1017U
Celeron 1017U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 29 votes

Rate Celeron 3855U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 70 votes

Rate Celeron 1017U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 3855U or Celeron 1017U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.