Xeon W-1370 vs Celeron 3215U
Aggregate performance score
Xeon W-1370 outperforms Celeron 3215U by a whopping 2022% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Celeron 3215U and Xeon W-1370 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2722 | 494 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 84.65 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Intel Celeron | no data |
| Power efficiency | 4.29 | 17.07 |
| Architecture codename | Broadwell (2015−2019) | Rocket Lake-S (2021) |
| Release date | 1 June 2015 (9 years ago) | 6 May 2021 (3 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $107 | $362 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Celeron 3215U and Xeon W-1370 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 1.7 GHz | 2.9 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.7 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| Bus rate | 5 GT/s | 8 GT/s |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 2 MB | 16 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 82 mm2 | 276 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 1300 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 3215U and Xeon W-1370 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FCBGA1168 | FCLGA1200 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 80 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 3215U and Xeon W-1370. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | + |
| Flex Memory Access | + | no data |
| Smart Response | - | no data |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | + |
| FDI | + | no data |
| Fast Memory Access | + | no data |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Celeron 3215U and Xeon W-1370 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | + |
| EDB | + | + |
| Secure Key | + | + |
| Identity Protection | + | + |
| SGX | no data | - |
| OS Guard | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 3215U and Xeon W-1370 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 3215U and Xeon W-1370. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB | 128 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | 50 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel® HD Graphics for 5th Generation Intel® Processors | Intel UHD Graphics P750 |
| Max video memory | no data | 64 GB |
| Quick Sync Video | + | + |
| Clear Video | + | + |
| Clear Video HD | - | + |
| Graphics max frequency | 850 MHz | 1.3 GHz |
| Execution Units | no data | 32 |
| InTru 3D | + | + |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 3215U and Xeon W-1370 integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 |
| eDP | + | no data |
| DisplayPort | + | - |
| HDMI | + | - |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron 3215U and Xeon W-1370 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
| 4K resolution support | no data | + |
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | no data | 4096x2160@60Hz |
| Max resolution over eDP | no data | 5120 x 3200 @60Hz |
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | no data | 5120 x 3200 @60Hz |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Celeron 3215U and Xeon W-1370 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | 11.2/12 | 12.1 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.5 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 3215U and Xeon W-1370.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 12 | 20 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.68 | 14.43 |
| Recency | 1 June 2015 | 6 May 2021 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 8 |
| Threads | 2 | 16 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 80 Watt |
Celeron 3215U has 433.3% lower power consumption.
Xeon W-1370, on the other hand, has a 2022.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads.
The Xeon W-1370 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 3215U in performance tests.
Be aware that Celeron 3215U is a notebook processor while Xeon W-1370 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 3215U and Xeon W-1370, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
