Celeron G5925 vs 3215U

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 3215U
2015
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.68
Celeron G5925
2020
2 threads, 58 Watt
1.75
+157%

Celeron G5925 outperforms Celeron 3215U by a whopping 157% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 3215U and Celeron G5925 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27222020
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency4.292.86
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)no data
Release date1 June 2015 (9 years ago)1 July 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 3215U and Celeron G5925 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)no data
Threads22
Base clock speed1.7 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.7 GHzno data
Bus rate5 GT/s8 GT/s
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache512 KBno data
L3 cache2 MB4 MB Intel® Smart Cache
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size82 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
Number of transistors1300 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 3215U and Celeron G5925 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1168FCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt58 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 3215U and Celeron G5925. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
Smart Response-no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Celeron 3215U and Celeron G5925 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Secure Key++
Identity Protection++
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guard-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 3215U and Celeron G5925 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 3215U and Celeron G5925. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-2666
Maximum memory size16 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s41.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics for 5th Generation Intel ProcessorsIntel UHD Graphics 610
Max video memoryno data64 GB
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video++
Clear Video HD-+
Graphics max frequency850 MHz1.05 GHz
InTru 3D++

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 3215U and Celeron G5925 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron 3215U and Celeron G5925 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2160@30Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096x2304@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron 3215U and Celeron G5925 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.2/1212
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 3215U and Celeron G5925.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes1216

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 3215U 0.68
Celeron G5925 1.75
+157%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 3215U 1083
Celeron G5925 2787
+157%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron 3215U 332
Celeron G5925 774
+133%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron 3215U 588
Celeron G5925 1266
+115%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.68 1.75
Integrated graphics card 0.77 1.89
Recency 1 June 2015 1 July 2020
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 58 Watt

Celeron 3215U has 286.7% lower power consumption.

Celeron G5925, on the other hand, has a 157.4% higher aggregate performance score, 145.5% faster integrated GPU, and an age advantage of 5 years.

The Celeron G5925 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 3215U in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron 3215U is a notebook processor while Celeron G5925 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 3215U and Celeron G5925, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 3215U
Celeron 3215U
Intel Celeron G5925
Celeron G5925

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 26 votes

Rate Celeron 3215U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 39 votes

Rate Celeron G5925 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 3215U or Celeron G5925, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.