UHD Graphics 610 vs HD Graphics

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot rated977
Place by popularity94not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.77
ArchitectureGeneration 7.0 (2012)Gen. 9 Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
GPU code nameIvy Bridge GT1Kaby Lake GT1
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 April 2012 (12 years ago)1 January 2019 (5 years ago)
Current price$286 $601

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4812
Core clock speed166 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1050 MHz950 MHz
Number of transistors392 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology22 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate6.30012.60
Floating-point performance15.6 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on HD Graphics and UHD Graphics 610 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x1
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64/128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.4
OpenGL4.04.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.1.801.1.103

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

HD Graphics 143
UHD Graphics 610 728
+409%

UHD Graphics 610 outperforms HD Graphics by 409% in Passmark.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

HD Graphics 300
UHD Graphics 610 664
+121%

UHD Graphics 610 outperforms HD Graphics by 121% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 2012 1 January 2019
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics and UHD Graphics 610. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics is a desktop card while UHD Graphics 610 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics
HD Graphics
Intel UHD Graphics 610
UHD Graphics 610

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 1825 votes

Rate HD Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 571 vote

Rate UHD Graphics 610 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.