Ryzen 9 5900X vs Celeron 2950M

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 2950M and Ryzen 9 5900X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	2516	175
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	70.85
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop processor
Series	Intel Celeron	AMD Ryzen 9
Architecture codename	Haswell (2013−2015)	Vermeer (Zen3) (2020)
Release date	1 September 2013 (10 years ago)	5 November 2020 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$75	$549
Current price	$73 (1x MSRP)	$303 (0.6x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Detailed specifications

Celeron 2950M and Ryzen 9 5900X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads	2	24
Base clock speed	2 GHz	3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed	2 GHz	4.8 GHz
L1 cache	64K (per core)	64K (per core)
L2 cache	256K (per core)	512K (per core)
L3 cache	2 MB (shared)	64 MB
Chip lithography	22 nm	7 nm
Die size	118 mm2	2x 80.7 + 125 (I/O) mm2
Maximum core temperature	100 °C	no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	105 °C	95 °C
Number of transistors	1,400 million	no data
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	+
Unlocked multiplier	No	Yes

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 2950M and Ryzen 9 5900X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	FCPGA946	AM4
Power consumption (TDP)	37 Watt	105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 2950M and Ryzen 9 5900X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2	86x MMX(+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A,-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA, Precision Boost 2
AES-NI	-	+
AVX	no data	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	-	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	no data
TSX	-	no data
Thermal Monitoring	+	no data
Status	Discontinued	no data

Security technologies

Celeron 2950M and Ryzen 9 5900X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	-	no data
EDB	+	no data
Secure Key	+	no data
Identity Protection	-	no data
Anti-Theft	-	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 2950M and Ryzen 9 5900X are enumerated here.

AMD-V	+	+
VT-d	-	no data
VT-x	+	no data
EPT	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 2950M and Ryzen 9 5900X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3	DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size	32 GB	128 GB
Max memory channels	2	2
Maximum memory bandwidth	25.6 GB/s	51.196 GB/s
ECC memory support	-	-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card	Intel® HD Graphics for 4th Generation Intel® Processors	-
Quick Sync Video	-	-
Graphics max frequency	1.1 GHz	-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 2950M and Ryzen 9 5900X integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported	3	-
eDP	+	-
DisplayPort	+	-
HDMI	+	-
VGA	+	-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 2950M and Ryzen 9 5900X.

PCIe version	2.0	4.0
PCI Express lanes	16	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms Celeron 2950M by 3065% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	0.80	25.32
Recency	1 September 2013	5 November 2020
Physical cores	2	12
Threads	2	24
Cost	$75	$549
Chip lithography	22 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	37 Watt	105 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 2950M and Ryzen 9 5900X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---