Xeon W-3245 vs Celeron 2.30
Primary details
Comparing Celeron 2.30 and Xeon W-3245 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 287 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 16.64 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | no data | Intel Xeon W |
| Power efficiency | no data | 8.99 |
| Architecture codename | Northwood (2002−2004) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| Release date | March 2003 (21 year ago) | 3 June 2019 (5 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $1,999 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Celeron 2.30 and Xeon W-3245 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 32 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.3 GHz | 4.6 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | DMI 3.0 |
| Bus rate | no data | 4 × 8 GT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 32 |
| L1 cache | 8 KB | 1 MB |
| L2 cache | 128 KB | 16 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 22 MB |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 146 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 77 °C |
| Number of transistors | 55 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 2.30 and Xeon W-3245 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | 478 | FCLGA3647 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 73 Watt | 205 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 2.30 and Xeon W-3245. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | + |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Celeron 2.30 and Xeon W-3245 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 2.30 and Xeon W-3245 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 2.30 and Xeon W-3245. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2 | DDR4-2933 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 1 TB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 6 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 140.8 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 2.30 and Xeon W-3245.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 64 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 16 |
| Threads | 1 | 32 |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 73 Watt | 205 Watt |
Celeron 2.30 has 180.8% lower power consumption.
Xeon W-3245, on the other hand, has 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Celeron 2.30 and Xeon W-3245. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Celeron 2.30 is a desktop processor while Xeon W-3245 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 2.30 and Xeon W-3245, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
