Xeon X7350 vs Opteron 6380

VS

Aggregate performance score

Opteron 6380
2012
16 cores / 16 threads, 115 Watt
4.29

Xeon X7350 outperforms Opteron 6380 by a moderate 17% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Opteron 6380 and Xeon X7350 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking13741227
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.59no data
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency3.463.59
Architecture codenameAbu Dhabi (2012)no data
Release date5 November 2012 (12 years ago)1 July 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,150no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Opteron 6380 and Xeon X7350 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)no data
Threads16no data
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2.93 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHzno data
L1 cache768 KBno data
L2 cache16 MBno data
L3 cache8 MB (per die)8 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography32 nm65 nm
Die size315 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data66 °C
Number of transistors2,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data1V-1.5V

Compatibility

Information on Opteron 6380 and Xeon X7350 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration4no data
SocketG34PGA604,PPGA604
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt130 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 6380 and Xeon X7350. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switchingno data+
FSB parityno data+

Security technologies

Opteron 6380 and Xeon X7350 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 6380 and Xeon X7350 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 6380 and Xeon X7350. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron 6380 and Xeon X7350.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Opteron 6380 4.29
Xeon X7350 5.03
+17.2%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Opteron 6380 6687
Xeon X7350 7836
+17.2%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.29 5.03
Recency 5 November 2012 1 July 2007
Chip lithography 32 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 130 Watt

Opteron 6380 has an age advantage of 5 years, a 103.1% more advanced lithography process, and 13% lower power consumption.

Xeon X7350, on the other hand, has a 17.2% higher aggregate performance score.

The Xeon X7350 is our recommended choice as it beats the Opteron 6380 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Opteron 6380 and Xeon X7350, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Opteron 6380
Opteron 6380
Intel Xeon X7350
Xeon X7350

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 25 votes

Rate Opteron 6380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 1 vote

Rate Xeon X7350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Opteron 6380 or Xeon X7350, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.