Athlon 64 X2 6400+ BE vs Celeron 1000M
Primary details
Comparing Celeron 1000M and Athlon 64 X2 6400+ BE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2748 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Celeron | no data |
| Power efficiency | 1.82 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | Windsor (2006−2007) |
| Release date | 20 January 2013 (11 years ago) | August 2007 (17 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $86 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Celeron 1000M and Athlon 64 X2 6400+ BE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Bus rate | 5 GT/s | no data |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | 256K (per core) | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 2 MB (shared) | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 90 nm |
| Die size | 118 mm2 | 230 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 105 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,400 million | 227 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 1000M and Athlon 64 X2 6400+ BE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | G2 (988B) | AM2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 125 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 1000M and Athlon 64 X2 6400+ BE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Security technologies
Celeron 1000M and Athlon 64 X2 6400+ BE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 1000M and Athlon 64 X2 6400+ BE are enumerated here.
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 1000M and Athlon 64 X2 6400+ BE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (650 - 1000 MHz) | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 125 Watt |
Celeron 1000M has a 309.1% more advanced lithography process, and 257.1% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Celeron 1000M and Athlon 64 X2 6400+ BE. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Celeron 1000M is a notebook processor while Athlon 64 X2 6400+ BE is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 1000M and Athlon 64 X2 6400+ BE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
