Intel Celeron 1000M vs Pentium 3556U

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

Pentium 3556U
0.69

Celeron 1000M outperforms Pentium 3556U by 1% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

Comparing Pentium 3556U and Celeron 1000M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking25722567
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel PentiumIntel Celeron
Architecture codenameHaswell (2013−2015)Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Release date1 September 2013 (10 years old)20 January 2013 (11 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$86
Current priceno data$219 (2.5x MSRP)

Technical specs

Pentium 3556U and Celeron 1000M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.7 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed1.7 GHz1.8 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm22 nm
Die size118 mm2118 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)105 °C105 °C
Number of transistors1,400 million1,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Pentium 3556U and Celeron 1000M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1168FCPGA988
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium 3556U and Celeron 1000M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI--
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFino data-
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
TSX-no data
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data+
SIPP-no data
Smart Response-no data
Demand Based Switchingno data-
GPIO+no data
Smart Connect+no data
FDI-+
Fast Memory Accessno data+
AMT9.5no data
Matrix Storage-no data
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued
HD Audio+no data
RST+no data

Security technologies

Pentium 3556U and Celeron 1000M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection-no data
OS Guard-no data
Anti-Theft--

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium 3556U and Celeron 1000M are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-d--
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium 3556U and Celeron 1000M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size16 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s25.6 GB/s
ECC memory support--

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 4th Generation Intel® ProcessorsIntel® HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel® Processors
Quick Sync Video--
Clear Video+-
Clear Video HD--
Graphics max frequency1 GHz1 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium 3556U and Celeron 1000M integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
SDVOno data+
CRTno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium 3556U and Celeron 1000M.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes1016
PCI support-no data
USB revision3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Integrated IDE-no data
Number of USB ports4no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium 3556U 0.69
Celeron 1000M 0.70
+1.4%

Celeron 1000M outperforms Pentium 3556U by 1% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Pentium 3556U 1058
Celeron 1000M 1074
+1.5%

Celeron 1000M outperforms Pentium 3556U by 2% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Pentium 3556U 313
+5%
Celeron 1000M 298

Pentium 3556U outperforms Celeron 1000M by 5% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Pentium 3556U 516
+1%
Celeron 1000M 511

Pentium 3556U outperforms Celeron 1000M by 1% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Pentium 3556U 2515
+1.4%
Celeron 1000M 2480

Pentium 3556U outperforms Celeron 1000M by 1% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Pentium 3556U 4854
+2%
Celeron 1000M 4757

Pentium 3556U outperforms Celeron 1000M by 2% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Pentium 3556U 1939
+0.8%
Celeron 1000M 1923

Pentium 3556U outperforms Celeron 1000M by 1% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Pentium 3556U 46.23
Celeron 1000M 41.63
+11%

Pentium 3556U outperforms Celeron 1000M by 11% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Pentium 3556U 1
Celeron 1000M 1
+2.1%

Celeron 1000M outperforms Pentium 3556U by 2% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Pentium 3556U 0.75
+1.4%
Celeron 1000M 0.74

Pentium 3556U outperforms Celeron 1000M by 1% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Pentium 3556U 0.2
Celeron 1000M 0.2
+6.7%

Celeron 1000M outperforms Pentium 3556U by 7% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Pentium 3556U 1190
Celeron 1000M 1285
+8%

Celeron 1000M outperforms Pentium 3556U by 8% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Pentium 3556U 49
+4.2%
Celeron 1000M 47

Pentium 3556U outperforms Celeron 1000M by 4% in x264 encoding pass 1.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Pentium 3556U 9
+7.2%
Celeron 1000M 8

Pentium 3556U outperforms Celeron 1000M by 7% in x264 encoding pass 2.

Geekbench 2

Benchmark coverage: 5%

Pentium 3556U 3129
Celeron 1000M 3405
+8.8%

Celeron 1000M outperforms Pentium 3556U by 9% in Geekbench 2.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 0.69 0.70
Recency 1 September 2013 20 January 2013
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 35 Watt

We couldn't decide between Pentium 3556U and Celeron 1000M. The differences in performance seem too small.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium 3556U and Celeron 1000M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium 3556U
Pentium 3556U
Intel Celeron 1000M
Celeron 1000M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 129 votes

Rate Intel Pentium 3556U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 143 votes

Rate Intel Celeron 1000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium 3556U or Celeron 1000M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.